The biggest setback for the party, however, came in February this year, when then Delhi Deputy Chief Minister and close Arvind Kejriwal aide Manish Sisodia was arrested by the CBI in the alleged liquor policy scam.

The raids against Mr Singh took place after he was named by businessman Dinesh Arora, an accused in the case, who later turned ‘approver’.

Mr Arora had claimed that the AAP leader had introduced him to Mr Sisodia, who was the excise minister.

The post AAP’s Sanjay Singh Arrested In Delhi Liquor Policy Case Hours After Raids appeared first on Uptimes News.

Surrounded by party workers and leaders, who gathered at the airport as he arrived from Delhi, Rai said, “Rahul Gandhi will definitely contest the Lok Sabha election from Amethi, the people of Amethi are here.” When asked about Union minister Smriti Irani, who defeated Rahul Gandhi in Amethi in the last election, Rai said she appears frustrated. “Smriti Irani seems frustrated. She said she will get sugar at ₹13 per kg, did she manage it? People from Amethi are here, ask them,” Rai said. Smriti Irani vs Rahul Gandhi According to HT’s sister publication Live Hindustan, Smriti Irani’s active engagement in Amethi has strengthened the BJP’s presence in the region. While BJP legislators hold sway in Jagdishpur, Tiloi and Salon assembly constituencies, the Samajwadi Party holds its grip over Gauriganj and Amethi seats.

Irani’s supporters in Amethi Lok Sabha seat highlight the developmental work carried out by both the central and state governments. Rahul Gandhi has visited Amethi three times since his defeat in the 2019 elections, and the possibility of him contesting again from the constituency has kept the local party leaders’ hopes alive. Gandhi has maintained a visible presence in Amethi, particularly during the Covid-19 pandemic when he provided relief materials to the region.  ABOUT THE AUTHOR Follow the latest breaking news and developments from India and around the world with Hindustan Times’ newsdesk. From politics and policies to the economy and the environment, from local issues to national events and global affairs, we’ve got you covered.

The post Rahul Gandhi vs Smriti Irani in Amethi again? How the contest will be in 2024. appeared first on Uptimes News.

“The prime minister sitting in the middle of Parliament was shamelessly laughing… The issue was not Congress or me, the issue was what is happening in Manipur and why it was not being stopped,” he said.
Gandhi said his remarks that Prime Minister Modi and home minister Amit Shah had “murdered Bharat Mata in Manipur” were not hollow. “Hindustan has been murdered by BJP in Manipur,” he said.

“When a person becomes PM, he should not speak like a petty politician. It’s tragic to watch PM Modi speak for 2 hours on the Congress, opposition. It doesn’t do justice to his position… The only conclusion I want to draw is that the PM has tools in hand but for some reasons, he refuses to use them. There are clear reasons why PM is not going to Manipur,” Gandhi said.
He said the Army can bring peace in 2-3 days but the government was not deploying it. “I am not seeking Army’s intervention. All I am saying is that Army can stop this nonsense in two days. It is not my position to say which tool PM Modi will use” the Congress leader said.

The post PM Modi Cracked Jokes in Parliament While Manipur Is Burning: Rahul Gandhi. appeared first on Uptimes News.

Smriti Irani, without directly mentioning Rahul Gandhi’s name, denounced the act by stating, “Only a misogynistic man can exhibit the gesture of a flying kiss towards female parliamentarians. This action sheds light on the lineage he originates from and reflects the attitude his family and party hold towards women.” Smriti Irani said that such behaviour had never been witnessed in the country’s Parliament before. BJP has questioned the appropriateness of the behaviour, labeling it as “chichora type behaviour,” as reported by HT. This parliamentary episode has resonated across major platforms such as TikTok, Twitter, Reddit, Instagram, Telegram, YouTube, and Facebook.

Here are some diverse reactions it drew from netizens on these different platforms, while some were hilarious involving memes, the others condemned the act suggesting it to be against the code of conduct in the parliament. X’s (formerly Twitter) reactionsOn Twitter, numerous users have crafted memes that humorously parody the incident, while others have voiced their disapproval of such conduct within the parliamentary arena. Certain individuals have even raised concerns about the appropriateness of such behaviour for an elected representative, fearing that it might compromise the decorum of the esteemed institution.
One of the user disapproved Rahul’s behaviour, calling him Pappu he said that he was not in Thailand or Las Vegas.

The post Rahul Gandhi’s flying kiss in Parliament. appeared first on Uptimes News.

Home Minister Amit Shah responded to the debate on the Bill by expressing his satisfaction that opposition members had finally joined in on the discussion in the House today. He emphasized that nine bills had already been passed during this session and said that the opposition parties simply participated in today’s debate in order to defend their recently formed coalition. He charged them of only caring about maintaining the coalition and disregarding issues that affect people. He asserted that Prime Minister Narendra Modi will retake office despite this alliance of the Opposition. He emphasized that the Bill complies with all relevant constitutional provisions. He explained that the Supreme Court had ruled in its decision that the Central Government could pass legislation pertaining to Delhi. He emphasized that the Constitution clearly grants Parliament the authority to pass laws for the national Capital. He emphasized that while Congress and the BJP had previously held positions of power in Delhi, there was no desire to seize them. The goal of every administration that was established, he said, was to fulfill the needs of the people, so there were no conflicts.

Without specifically identifying the Aam Aadmi Party, he claimed that a party came to power in Delhi in 2015 with no intention of doing anything but fighting for the city’s residents. According to Mr. Shah, the problem is not obtaining the authority to carry out transfer postings but rather gaining control of the vigilance agency in order to cover up corruption in the National Capital.

The Government is prepared for a lengthy discussion on Manipur, the Home Minister added in another statement. Adhir Ranjan Chowdhury of the Congress opened the discussion by labeling the Bill as being against the nation’s central government. Additionally, he questioned the government’s haste in bringing a service-related Ordinance, asking why it was necessary. He also questioned the motivation behind the Bill’s introduction, claiming that similar efforts to undermine the authority of other governments will be made.

Kalyan Banerjee of TMC alleged that this legislation is an attack on the federal structure. He stressed that the States are not subservient to the Union. He said, the government should heed the mandate of the people as residents of Delhi must have a voice as to how they are governed. Rajiv Ranjan Singh alias Lallan Singh of JD(U) opposed the legislation and accused the Centre of trying to rule Delhi indirectly.

Ramesh Bidhuri of BJP said that several promises have been made by the Aam Aadmi Party in Delhi which are still unfulfilled. He alleged that AAP is involved in corrupt practices in Delhi. P. V. Midhun Reddy of YSRCP spoke in support of the Bill. He termed it as unique saying the Bill aims to restore certain power to LG.
BJD’s Pinaki Mishra supported the Bill saying Parliament has plenary jurisdiction to enact laws regarding Delhi. Supriya Sule of NCP opposed the Bill terming it undemocratic and unconstitutional. Shashi Tharoor of Congress, Meenakshi Lekhi of BJP, Harsimrat Kaur Badal of SAD, NK Premachandran of RSP were among those who participated in the debate.

The post Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi (Amendment) Bill, 2023. appeared first on Uptimes News.

The defamation case was filed against Rahul Gandhi in [Year] by a member of the ruling party, claiming that his remark was defamatory and intended to malign the Prime Minister’s reputation. The controversy began when Rahul Gandhi made the comment during a public address, sparking heated debates across the nation.

Supreme Court stays conviction of Rahul Gandhi in defamation case for remark on Modi surname. #ModiSurnameCase #Congress #SupremeCourt pic.twitter.com/zcO2gNJSG4

— UPTIMESNEWS (@Uptimesnewslive) August 4, 2023

In response to the conviction, Rahul Gandhi’s legal team appealed to the higher courts to review the judgment. Finally, after a long legal battle, the Supreme Court intervened and granted a stay on the conviction, allowing Rahul Gandhi temporary relief from any legal consequences resulting from the remark.

The Supreme Court’s decision received mixed reactions from the public, with some praising the upholding of free speech, while others criticized the remark as disrespectful towards the Prime Minister. The case’s outcome also highlighted the delicate balance between freedom of expression and defamation laws in India’s legal system.

As the matter continues to be of national interest, political analysts and experts anticipate further developments in the case. It remains to be seen how this verdict will impact political discourse and the legal framework concerning defamation and freedom of speech in the country.

The post Supreme Court stays conviction of Rahul Gandhi in defamation case for remark on Modi surname. appeared first on Uptimes News.

The Bill has a provision to set up the Data Protection Board of India. The Board on receipt of an intimation of personal data breach will inquire the matter and impose penalty. According to the Bill, a penalty of 250 crore rupees can be imposed in case of a breach in observing the obligation of data fiduciary of personal data. While determining the amount of monetary penalty to be imposed, the Board will consider the nature, gravity and duration of the breach and the type, and nature of the personal data affected by the breach. The Bill states that individuals have the right to correction, completion, updating and erasure of their personal data of which they have previously given consent.

When the House met after the first adjournment at 2 PM, Electronics and Information Technology Minister Ashwini Vaishnaw introduced the Bill in the House. Opposing the introduction of the Bill, Congress member Adhir Ranjan Chowdhury said that the bill violates the provisions of Right to Information Act as well as compromises with Right to Privacy. He demanded that the bill should be sent to the standing committee or Joint Parliamentary Committee for further discussion. Saugata Roy of TMC also made a similar demand. Supriya Sule of NCP said, the Bill promotes the excessive centralization of data and it also violates provisions of Right to Information Act. NK Premchandran of RSP also said, the Bill violates the fundamental rights of people.

Manish Tewari, Shashi Tharoor and Gaurav Gogoi of Congress also spoke against the introduction of the Bill along with Asaduddin Owaisi of AIMIM. Moving the Bill, the Minister clarified that it is a general bill and not a money bill. He added that the government is ready to discuss all the points raised by the Opposition members. However, opposing the introduction of the Bill, members from Congress, DMK, TMC, NCP, and others staged a walkout from the House.

The post IT minister Ashwini Vaishnaw tables data protection bill in Lok Sabha. appeared first on Uptimes News.

The post PM Narendra Modi Tells NDA MPs, Cautions Against ‘Frustrated’ Opposition’s Bait. appeared first on Uptimes News.

The Gyanvapi Mosque, located in the holy city of Varanasi, holds immense historical and religious significance. It stands adjacent to the revered Kashi Vishwanath Temple, one of the most sacred sites for Hindus worldwide. The mosque’s history dates back to the 17th century when Mughal Emperor Aurangzeb ordered its construction, leading to the partial demolition of the original Kashi Vishwanath Temple.

During a recent public address, Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath made a contentious remark, calling the existence of the Gyanvapi Mosque a “historical mistake.” He claimed that the mosque’s construction was a symbol of the Mughal era’s oppression and religious intolerance towards Hindus. Yogi Adityanath’s statement has drawn polarizing reactions from various quarters.

Criticism from Muslim Leaders: Muslim leaders have strongly condemned the Chief Minister’s remarks, viewing them as an attempt to incite communal tensions and undermine religious harmony. They assert that the Gyanvapi Mosque has been an integral part of Varanasi’s cultural fabric for centuries and deserves equal respect and protection.

Walls are Screaming: Yogi Adityanath Calls Mosque in Gyanvapi a Historical Mistake. #UPCM #UttarPradesh pic.twitter.com/o724W68RS5

— UPTIMESNEWS (@Uptimesnewslive) July 31, 2023

Political Responses: As expected, the issue has become highly politicized, with various political parties taking sides. The ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) has supported Yogi Adityanath’s stance, emphasizing the need to preserve Hindu heritage. On the other hand, opposition parties have accused the Chief Minister of playing divisive politics for electoral gains.

The statement made by Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath, referring to the Gyanvapi Mosque as a “historical mistake,” has added fuel to an already contentious issue. While there is a need to respect and preserve the cultural heritage of all communities, it is crucial to find a common ground that fosters communal harmony and mutual understanding. The ongoing legal battles over the site’s ownership will likely determine the future course of this contentious issue.

The post Walls are Screaming: Yogi Adityanath Calls Mosque in Gyanvapi a Historical Mistake. appeared first on Uptimes News.

A no-confidence motion is a potent parliamentary tool that enables the opposition to voice its disapproval of the policies and actions of the current administration. If such a resolution is approved, the incumbent administration may be toppled, which would either result in new elections or the establishment of a coalition government. A successful no-confidence vote might have significant effects on the country’s governance and political landscape given the current political atmosphere.

The no-confidence motion’s progress are being eagerly watched by Indian citizens. They are anxious to observe how their elected officials serve the interests of the country and how their issues and complaints are addressed during legislative debates. The public has high expectations and believes that political leaders should put the needs of the people ahead of partisan considerations.

The Indian political environment is still active and filled with anticipation as Mr. Mallikarjun Kharge pursues his outreach attempts to win support for the no-confidence vote. As the motion’s fate hangs in the balance, the upcoming days will see heated conversations, negotiations, and disputes. The result of this crucial political maneuver will unquestionably influence the destiny of the nation and determine the direction of its governance.

The post Mallikarju Kharge reaches out to INDIA partners over no-confidence. appeared first on Uptimes News.